Neuronpedia logo - a computer chip with a rounded viewfinder border around it

    Neuronpedia

    INDEX
    Explanations

    references to legal and judicial matters

    oai_token-act-pair · gpt-3.5-turbo

    references to court rulings and judicial opinions

    oai_token-act-pair · gpt-4o-miniTriggered by @bot
    New Auto-Interp
    Negative Logits
     destro
    -0.80
    obyl
    -0.73
     livest
    -0.73
     sacrific
    -0.73
     Kardashian
    -0.72
     Kurd
    -0.71
    uilt
    -0.70
     pent
    -0.67
     Pesh
    -0.67
     Sunrise
    -0.67
    POSITIVE LOGITS
     justices
    1.04
     Scalia
    0.92
    rooms
    0.85
    Justice
    0.83
    room
    0.80
    sup
    0.79
     Gorsuch
    0.76
    pedia
    0.76
    Layout
    0.74
     Clarence
    0.73
    Act Density 0.059%
    05101520250200400
    −0.6−0.4−0.200.20.40.60.8102k4k
    redactions!].)↵
    ↵
    Although the Court is satisfied that the effect of the government
    and decision on remand.1 The Court, however, disqualifies the class at
    )(2). In so ruling, the Court imports into the Rule 23(a)
    b)(3) is not before the Court, and I would reserve that matter for
    narrowly tailored to this specific case. The Court ruled that Hobby Lobby and other employers could
    a FISC order.↵
    ↵
    The Court sees nothing in the language of the Act
    application "as modified").↵
    ↵
    The Court is cognizant of the fact that
    berg said the court properly ruled that the court should not allow the class under one part
    , however. Justice Ginsberg said the court properly ruled that the court should not allow
    does not require any such thing). The CourtâĢĻs opinion doesnâĢĻt
    due process clause has been held by the Court applicable to matters of substantive law as well
    Kagan; Justice Thomas joined with the courtâĢĻs liberals in the majority,
    yer), the smart money is on the Court ruling against the NLRB. One more
    ers regard as progressive legal activism from the Court. Of course, what right-wing
    ox is being gored or what the Court has done previously, that racial gerry
    Court Justice Antonin Scalia, writing the court's opinion, acknowledged that the case represented
    – gerrymandering, as the Court had previously upheld similar actions taken by North
    law. In The Prize Cases, the Court explained that âĢľ(f)rom
    ito voted to deny the action, the court said.↵
    ↵
    âĢľWe are
    s liberals in the majority, while Justices Alito, Roberts, and Kennedy diss
    ices Alito, Roberts, and Kennedy dissented in part. (Justice Gorsuch did
    ↵
    In delivering his first opinion of the court, Justice Neil Gorsuch relied on the plain
    delivering his first opinion of the court, Justice Neil Gorsuch relied on the plain text of
    application.↵
    ↵
    The order said the courtâĢĻs action was in line with
    rulings, Gorsuch said it is not the courtâĢĻs job to rewrite a constitutionally
    claim, there was still dissent among the justices as to whether the underlying issues were valid
    the Texas case, in part because the justices previously allowed the Texas admitting privileges provision to
    rights advocates. The provisions blocked by the justices are part of a law that has shut
    in a high-profile case. The justices heard oral arguments in that case on Wednesday
    the first time online.↵
    ↵
    The court announced Thursday that it will launch an electronic
    of his way to insist repeatedly that the CourtâĢĻs decision in this case was
    s seven justices to step aside when the court hears the case in April.↵
    ↵
    based on race. The 5-3 opinion was written by Justice Kagan; Justice
    and Kennedy dissented in part. (Justice Gorsuch did not participate, as the case
    let our minds be bold.↵
    ↵
    Justice Louis Brandeis, U.S
    attend, but the newest member of the court, Justice Neil Gorsuch, was expected to
    ty judgment is its mob logic. The court deemed Woods's jokes a crime under section
    apportion the debt," Acting Supreme Court Justice Andrew A. Crecca (See Profile
    considerations militate against it."↵
    ↵
    Justice Edwards-Stuart added it was "
    a 2014 lawsuit opposing the project. The court order requires the state to redo the
    public access should increase public comprehension of SCOTUS and its critical role in the justice system
    and thus be distracted.↵
    ↵
    The court's opinion came out of an earlier texting
    limited the NSA to seeking approval from the court to search the collection back in 2009,
    court ruling, but as a few other courts have made some similar claims, perhaps it
    activities,âĢĿ Rahn told the court.↵
    ↵
    It was unclear whether this
    Staff]<|endoftext|> nominating Scalia to the High Court:↵
    ↵
    Foremost in the minds
    ↵
    ↵
    In their joint statement, the Justice Department and Office of the Director of National
    Jazeera has always maintained was flawed. The court can dismiss the cases, uphold the verdict
    the state.↵
    ↵
    A Florida appellate court ruled today that jury instructions, which unfairly
    the PIL.↵
    ↵
    The Division Bench said: ÂĵThe media wrongly reported
    to dine with members of the Supreme Court, but itâĢĻs not entirely
    Marshall, who had been a legendary litigator for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
    The amended order, written by outgoing FISC judge Reggie Walton, makes the<|endoftext|>Michael
    among legal scholars and historians that the Framers assumed customary international law would continue to govern